Planning, credit recovery, strategic installment agreements and high-stakes litigation — from administrative proceedings and CARF to the courts.
The firm litigates tax matters at the administrative and judicial levels — including CARF proceedings, high-value tax enforcement actions, and restructuring of tax liabilities for companies in judicial reorganization.
The technical base combines a graduate degree in Economic Criminal Law (FGV/SP), training in Finance, Investments and Banking (PUC/RS), and membership in the Brazilian Institute of Tax Planning — treating a tax problem as what it is: a legal and financial question at once.
Complete diagnosis of the company's tax obligations and recommendation of the right tax regime — optimizing taxes due, avoiding overpayment, and using incentives, exemptions and reduction opportunities.
Detailed review of taxes such as ICMS, PIS, COFINS and IPI to identify overpayments and recover them through offset or refund before the competent authorities.
Negotiation of tax debt installment agreements, such as ICMS, with the State Treasury for companies in judicial or extrajudicial reorganization — preserving cash flow.
Defense against assessments and disputes with tax authorities, challenging charges in administrative and judicial proceedings — including CARF — to avoid penalties and protect company assets.
Tax assessments can evolve into charges of tax crimes, money laundering and crimes against the financial system — reaching partners and executives directly.
Here, tax defense and corporate criminal defense move together from day one: the tax strategy is built with its criminal implications in mind, and vice versa.
Discuss your company's caseThe assessment can be challenged administratively — including before CARF — and then in court. In many cases the liability can be reduced, paid in installments or offset with credits. Acting within the defense deadlines is essential.
It is common — especially ICMS, PIS/COFINS and IPI. A review of the last 5 years identifies overpayments recoverable through offset or refund.
Yes. Certain conduct related to non-payment or tax reporting is treated as a crime against the tax order, reaching partners and executives. That is why the firm works both fronts in a coordinated way.
Initial review of the company's tax scenario, confidential, with an objective read on risks and opportunities.
Request a case review